14 jun. OSM. RV Fonte: Pensa. Estácio – Apostila de Organização, Sistemas e Métodos. Mundo das Marcas: football strategy OSM. and have my say about how OSM engine should work in my opinion to make OSM better game . APOSTILA OSM (1). OSM for Data Preparedness in Indonesia State of OSM Indonesia: Disaster Preparedness and Community Growth Yantisa Akhadi â @hotosm. org.

Author: Vidal Kizahn
Country: Anguilla
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 4 June 2005
Pages: 81
PDF File Size: 15.77 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.89 Mb
ISBN: 363-3-52855-527-9
Downloads: 11355
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akirg

When playing against attacking tactics and formations, it should almost always have worse stats. But it can odm againstor which could dominate both midfield and defence areas.

Aula11 Osm Arq Organizacional.

OSM – Instruction manuals

First I’m going to suggest what tactics should be defensive and offensive generally and then I’ll comment on all available formations and what tactics should work with them. Even defensive teams must play direct football and try to reach reasonable distance to shoot playing on the counter, long ball or even play wide which is again counterattacking.

It could do well against weak midfield such as or since it has advantage in defence and midfield area. But it has better midfield and could also do well against formations with 4 or 3 midfielders and 2 attackers such as and Strong teams only should be successful with SOS tactics because they have attacking potential to create shots on goal and score.

Currently SOS works the best with defensive formations and apostiila playing defensive you should not have that many shots on goal and better possession because you sit back and invite pressure a;ostila the opponent who dictates the tempo.

Osm Course Quality Rubric. If playing attacking, like in Dutch football, teams utilize on their full backs, wingers and attacker in the box who should convert apoostila chances. So it could aposttila with one or 2 attackers but who have good ratings to deal with more defenders alone or provide midfielders set to support attack. No team rally solely on desperately shoot on goal apostola all positions. The problem with this formation is when it faces attacking formations with only 3 defenders, such as or where its outnumbered in midfield and would see very little of the ball.


SOS should not work with defensive mentality and formations such as aoostila It can be bad choice against other attacking formations such as,etc. It could also dominate any 3-men defence and also concede less goals because of strong defence on its own.

State of OSM Indonesia 2015

To the running of this website, we need your help to support us. Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. And its bad choice against or because lone attacker will have tough time to score against that many defenders.

We Need Your Support. Please download to get full document.

In order to be broken, attackers must be quality and clinical in order to score against 6 midfielders. SOS should work with attacking formations which attempt to score and not sit back. It could do well against formations with weak midfield such as or but it could have problems against formations with good attackers and stronger midfield such as, and It could be deployed with play wide and passing game with attacking mentality but also with counterattacking and defensive mentality a team can defend nicely with 8 men behind the ball and initiate nice counterattacks where 2 attackers up front await the ball.

But it can be bad against formations with good attack such as, etc. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. It could work well against formations with weaker midfield,where it could dominate possession.

If attackers are good, this formation could dominate formations with smaller or equal number of defenders,,all resulting in high scoring games. It has balanced defence, strong midfield and weak attack.

Psm are still 3 central midfielders, 4 at the back and one real CF. It could even work with with best teams with really strong midfield and attack see Barcelona, Real, Dortmund, Bayern in real life. It should be really good against any 3 or men defences if it can afford good attackers.



It should almost always generate high scoring games because of many attackers and weak defence. Offensive tactics should be: Three midfielders should help defence and provide those balls to the wings.

Thus, it should be only deployed if those 3 midfielders are world class.

Clenilson Osm 3p Adm. OK folks, here it is Like it should almost solely work with long ball tactics both with attacking and defensive mentality. It could work with We are nonprofit website to share and download documents.

Obviously I couldn’t cover all possible combinations but if at least some of my thoughts influence Gamebasics to improve the match engine I would be very happy. This way team wont have many chances to shoot from reasonable distance and position, it must quickly counter and build up such position and not just shoots from 50 meters.

It should be successful against formations with less men in midfield such as, etc. Like I said in other thread, SOS should be solely attacking tactics because attacking teams usually shot more on goal in real life, not defending teams. It can also be used with counter attacks with defensive mentality. What Stefan wrote below deserves GB’s serious consideration in my view as it’s for the good of the game and benefits everyone.

It should work well for strong teams against formations with only 3 men at the back such as or It could work even againstand but the problem is that its seriously outnumbered in midfield.

Previous post: